Five sessions where we transform one of your projects (real client work, side project, or course assignment) into a portfolio case study that gets responses. We cover the structure recruiters at product companies look for, how to write the narrative, how to show process without boring people, and how to present numbers honestly. By the end you have one polished case study and a template you can re-use for the rest of your portfolio.
Session# 1: Pick the project, define the angle, draft the structure
1Hr
A working session. We pick which project, decide the angle (research-led, systems-led, outcome-led), and draft the section headings.
Session# 2: Write the problem and process sections
1Hr
Recruiters skim — your problem statement has 5 seconds. We write yours together. Same for the process — show enough, not all.
Session# 3: The visuals — what to show, what to hide
1Hr
Choosing the right images. Annotating screens. Before-and-after comparisons. The visuals do half the storytelling.
Session# 4: Outcomes — telling numbers honestly
1Hr
How to present impact when you do not have hard metrics. Soft outcomes, qualitative wins, what-I-learned framings that still feel honest.
Session# 5: Live presentation + portfolio polish
1Hr
You walk through the case study with me as if I were the interviewer. We refine the spots that lose me. Final polish on layout and copy.
A polished portfolio case study you can put on your site this week
A re-usable template to write all future case studies faster
Confidence presenting your process to interviewers without rambling
Honest, recruiter-tested feedback on what to keep and what to cut
One project (any kind — real client, side, or course) you can document
Existing screens or designs from that project
A portfolio site or template (Notion, Read.cv, Framer all fine)
My sessions are research- and critique-led. We use real briefs (yours or mine), build flows in Figma, run quick user tests, and iterate. Light on theory, heavy on doing.
| Language | Spoken Level |
|---|---|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
My sessions are research- and critique-led. We use real briefs (yours or mine), build flows in Figma, run quick user tests, and iterate. Light on theory, heavy on doing.
| Language | Spoken Level |
|---|---|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
| Urdu |
|
| English |
|
